Randomized placebo-controlled phase II trial of autologous mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) in multiple sclerosis

[2009-016442-74] Randomized placebo-controlled phase II trial of autologous mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) in multiple sclerosis.

Original authors : Llufriu S, Sepulveda M, Blanco Y, Marin P, Moreno B, et al.

Source : PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0113936

Download “Table 2009-016442-74-msc” 2009-016442-74-msc.zip – Downloaded 4 times – 1.24 MB
Copyright : Unrestricted use of report data provided the original author and source are credited (raw royalty-free data).

Methods
 
Objective:

This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover phase II studies safety and efficacy of autologous mesenchymal stem cells in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis patients.


Assessment:

The study was performed in Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, Spain, between November 2010 and June 2012.
Nine patients unresponsive to conventional therapy, defined by at least 1 relapse and/or GEL on MRI scan in past 12 months, disease duration 2 to 10 years and Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) 3.0-6.5, were randomized to receive IV 1-2E+6 bone-marrow-derives-MSCs/kg or Placebo.
After 6 months, the treatment was reversed and patients were followed-up for another 6 months.

Primary outcome criteria of this study is therefore the change number of gadolinium-enhancing lesions (GEL) on magnetic at the end of the study.
Secondary outcomes are (i) new lesions or enlarging lesions on serially registered long repetition time images, (ii) volume and percentage of brain volume change and (iii) clinical outcomes (relapses and disability by EDSS and MS Functional Composite).

Codings and variables generated following the freeze of the database
Table 1 : Encodings
Study principles 
DescriptionsQualitative variables are described with frequencies and level percentages.
Quantitative variables are described with means and standard deviations, quartiles, minimum/maximum.
AssociationsThe association between a quantitative parameter and « Group (TRAIT1) » item was evaluated with Student(Sd) test (paired samples), Wilcoxon(Wc) sign test or Friedman(Fm) test depending on the conditions of validity.
The association between a qualitative parameter and « Group (TRAIT1) » item was evaluated with Mc Nemar(MN) test or Cochran(Cc) test.
Paired analysisThe association strength of the treatment with « Change in the number of GEL (GAD_LESIONS2) » item was evaluated and retranscribed as Mean differences with 95% confidence intervals and using Wald statistic.
Table 2 : Study principles
Flowchart
 
Figure 1 : Flowchart
Results : Initial characteristics
 
 PopulationGroup (TRAIT1)
 _MSCsPlacebo
 N=18N=9N=9
 Mean±SD
Med(Q1Q3)
Min-Max

or
Mean±SD
Med(Q1Q3)
Min-Max

or
Mean±SD
Med(Q1Q3)
Min-Max

or
Variable n%coln%coln%col
Gender (GENDER)man422.2222.2222.2
 woman1477.8777.8777.8
 Total18100950950
 
Age (AGE_ENTRY)Mean ±SD36.78±8.1736.78±8.4236.78±8.42
 Median (Q1-Q3)41(30-43)41(30-43)41(30-43)
 Min-Max234823482348
 
Disease duration (DIFONSET_ENTRY)Mean ±SD8.26±2.528.26±2.598.26±2.59
 Median (Q1-Q3)9.08(7.25-9.33)9.08(7.25-9.33)9.08(7.25-9.33)
 Min-Max4.2512.54.2512.54.2512.5
 
Relapses in previous 2 years (RELAPSES_2LASTY)Mean ±SD2.44±1.292.44±1.332.44±1.33
 Median (Q1-Q3)2(2-3)2(2-3)2(2-3)
 Min-Max151515
 
Relapses in the last year (RELAPSE_LASTYEAR)Mean ±SD1.67±0.841.67±0.871.67±0.87
 Median (Q1-Q3)1(1-2)1(1-2)1(1-2)
 Min-Max131313
 
Annualized relapse rate (ANNUALRELAPSES)Mean ±SD1.04±0.491.04±0.511.04±0.51
 Median (Q1-Q3)0.9(0.63-1.52)0.9(0.63-1.52)0.9(0.63-1.52)
 Min-Max0.551.840.551.840.551.84
 
EDSS (EDSSATENTRY)Mean ±SD4±0.914±0.944±0.94
 Median (Q1-Q3)3.5(3.5-4)3.5(3.5-4)3.5(3.5-4)
 Min-Max363636
 
Time to EDSS 3.0 (years) (YEDSS3)Mean ±SD6.67±1.996.67±2.056.67±2.05
 Median (Q1-Q3)7(5.5-7.5)7(5.5-7.5)7(5.5-7.5)
 Min-Max3.8103.8103.810
 
Time to EDSS 4.0 (years) (YEDSS4)Mean ±SD7.27±3.227.27±3.487.27±3.48
 Median (Q1-Q3)6.67(4.88-9.67)6.67(4.88-9.67)6.67(4.88-9.67)
 Min-Max3.75123.75123.7512
 
Time to EDSS 6.0 (years) (YEDSS6)Mean ±SD8±08±08±0
 Median (Q1-Q3)8(8-8)8(8-8)8(8-8)
 Min-Max888888
 
MSFC, z score (ZMSFCS_BASAL)Mean ±SD-0.3±0.51-0.3±0.52-0.3±0.52
 Median (Q1-Q3)-0.28(-0.76–0.09)-0.28(-0.76–0.09)-0.28(-0.76–0.09)
 Min-Max-1.010.48-1.010.48-1.010.48
 
MSSS (MSSSENTRY)Mean ±SD5.82±1.245.82±1.285.82±1.28
 Median (Q1-Q3)5.36(4.93-6.78)5.36(4.93-6.78)5.36(4.93-6.78)
 Min-Max4.177.654.177.654.177.65
 
Number of GEL (GAD_LESIONS_BASAL)Mean ±SD4.67±8.074.67±8.324.67±8.32
 Median (Q1-Q3)0(0-3)0(0-3)0(0-3)
 Min-Max022022022
 
T2 lesion volume, ml (FLAIR_VOL_BAS2)Mean ±SD19.24±15.7419.24±16.2319.24±16.23
 Median (Q1-Q3)16.27(12.84-20.83)16.27(12.84-20.83)16.27(12.84-20.83)
 Min-Max3.0858.173.0858.173.0858.17
 
Prior approved disease-modifying therapy (RECOD_FIRSTLINE)Betaferon or ciclofosfamida844.4444.4444.4
 Copaxone422.2222.2222.2
 Rebif44633.3333.3333.3
 Total18100950950
 
Table 3 : Initial characteristics cross sort
 
Results : Primary outcome
 
At the end of the study, no association is highlighted between Group and number of GEL (p = 0.0938 / p = 0.0612), number of new or enlarging T2 lesions (p = 0.5625), volume and percentage of brain volume change (p = 0.2031 / p = 0.2500) and clinical outcomes (p = 1.0000 / p = 0.8125 / p = 0.9453).
However, a trend to reduced mean GEL in patients treated with MSCs is observed.
 PopulationGroup (TRAIT1) 
 _MSCsPlacebo 
 N=18N=9N=9Statistic
Variable Mean±SD
Med(Q1Q3)
Min-Max
Mean±SD
Med(Q1Q3)
Min-Max
Mean±SD
Med(Q1Q3)
Min-Max
p
Change in the number of GEL (GAD_LESIONS2)Mean ±SD0.11±6.22-2.78±5.893±5.36Wc p = 0.0938
 Median (Q1-Q3)0(-1-2)0(-5-0)1(0-6) 
 Min-Max-16-15-16-4-3-15 
 
Wc : Wilcoxon
Table 4 : Primary outcome cross sort

Figure 2 : Primary outcome

 Change in the number of GEL (GAD_LESIONS2) 
 N=18n=18
Variable MD*[95%CI]Wd p
Group (TRAIT1)MSCs0 0.0612
 Placebo 5.778[-0.345 ; 11.900] 
 
Wd : Wald   *MD : Mean Difference
Table 5 : Association strength of treatment with primary outcome

Results : Secondary outcomes
 
 PopulationGroup (TRAIT1) 
 _MSCsPlacebo 
 N=18N=9N=9Statistic
Variable Mean±SD
Med(Q1Q3)
Min-Max
Mean±SD
Med(Q1Q3)
Min-Max
Mean±SD
Med(Q1Q3)
Min-Max
p
Number of new or enlarging T2 lesions (N_T2_NEW2)Mean ±SD23.39±40.4723.78±42.4223±40.99Wc p = 0.5625
 Median (Q1-Q3)9(0-21)7(0-14)12(0-21) 
 Min-Max0-1300-1300-130 
 
Change in T2 lesion volume, ml (FLAIR_VOL)Mean ±SD1.73±3.20.58±1.172.89±4.16Wc p = 0.2031
 Median (Q1-Q3)0.78(0-1.88)0.02(0-0.88)1.08(0.09-2.96) 
 Min-Max-0.94-12.32-0.94-3.18-0.03-12.32 
 
Percentage of brain volume change, % (VOL_BASELTO)Mean ±SD-0.35±0.46-0.51±0.52-0.19±0.34Wc p = 0.2500
 Median (Q1-Q3)-0.37(-0.59-0)-0.5(-0.61–0.32)-0.01(-0.5-0) 
 Min-Max-1.45-0.34-1.45-0.34-0.68-0.28 
 
No of relapses (TOTALRELAP)Mean ±SD0.78±1.060.78±1.090.78±1.09Wc p = 1.0000
 Median (Q1-Q3)0(0-1)0(0-1)0(0-1) 
 Min-Max0-30-30-3 
 
EDSS change (EDSS)Mean ±SD0.08±0.520.17±0.560±0.5Wc p = 0.8125
 Median (Q1-Q3)0(0-0)0(0-0.5)0(0-0) 
 Min-Max-1-1-0.5-1-1-1 
 
MSFC z-score change (ZMSFC)Mean ±SD0.13±0.380.18±0.380.09±0.4Wc p = 0.9453
 Median (Q1-Q3)0.11(-0.15-0.31)0.27(-0.15-0.29)0(-0.04-0.31) 
 Min-Max-0.69-0.93-0.25-0.93-0.69-0.6 
 
Wc : Wilcoxon
Table 6 : Secondary outcomes cross sort

Figure 3 : Secondary outcomes

Tables and figures
 
Table 1 : Encodings
Table 2 : Study principles
Table 3 : Initial characteristics cross sort
Table 4 : Primary outcome cross sort
Table 5 : Association strength of treatment with primary outcome
Table 6 : Secondary outcomes cross sort
Figure 1 : Flowchart
Figure 2 : Primary outcome
Figure 3 : Secondary outcomes
Date of completion : 2 August 2020
Implementer : RUS
Software version 0.1
- Share the content -

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *