Anti-interleukin-1 treatment in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and type 2 diabetes: A multicentre open-label randomised controlled trial

[2012-005370-62] Anti-interleukin-1 treatment in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and type 2 diabetes: A multicentre open-label randomised controlled trial.

Ruscitti P, Masedu F, Alvaro S, Airò P, Battafarano N, Cantarini L, et al.

Source : PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002901

Download “Table 2012-005370-62-track” 2012-005370-62-track.zip – Downloaded 2 times – 1.22 MB
Copyright : Unrestricted use of report data provided the original author and source are credited (raw royalty-free data).

Methods
 
Objective:

Aim of the study is to evaluate whether interleukin-1 (IL-1) inhibition with anakinra, a recombinant human IL-1 receptor antagonist, can improve both glycaemic and inflammatory parameters in participants with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and type 2 diabetes (T2D) compared with tumour necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFis).


Assessment:

The study is a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial performed in 12 Italian rheumatologic units between June 2013 and March 2016.
In this study, 41 participants with RA and T2D were randomised, and 39 eligible participants were treated with Anakinra or TNFis.

The primary outcome is the change in percentage of glycated haemoglobin (A1c) between baseline and subsequent visits (after 3 months and 6 months of follow-up).
Secondary outcomes are DAS28 in assessing RA features and Fasting plasma glucose (FPG) in assessing T2D parameters.


Study principles:

The statistical analysis provided descriptive statistics and linear mixed models for the primary and secondary end points.

Qualitative variables are described with frequencies and level percentages (Column percentages here).
Quantitative variables are described with means and standard deviations, quartiles.

Warning, at least one selection of observation(s) was made on the initial database.
Codings and variables generated following the freeze of the database
Table 1 : Encodings

1. Study profile
 
1.1. Flowchart
[Top of page]
Flowchart
A total of 39 participants were randomly assigned to the study groups: 22 to anakinra, 17 to TNFi.

Figure 1 : Study profile – Flowchart – Flowchart

2. Results
 
2.1. Baseline Characteristics of the Study Patients
[Top of page]
Participants had an average age of 62.72 ± 9.97 years, 74.4% were female.
The majority had seropositive RA disease (rheumatoid factor [RF]: 56.4% and/or anticyclic citrullinated peptide antibody [ACPA]: 61.5%) with active disease (Disease Activity Score-28 [DAS28]: 5.55 ± 1.03).
All participants had T2D (A1c: 7.77 ± 0.7, fasting plasma glucose [FPG]: 139.13 ± 42.17 mg).

 PopulationStudy Drug (STUDY_DRUG)
 _AnakinraTNFi
 N=39N=22N=17
 Mean±SD
Med(Q1Q3)

or
Mean±SD
Med(Q1Q3)

or
Mean±SD
Med(Q1Q3)

or
Variable n%coln%coln%col
Age (AGE)Mean ±SD62.72±9.9762.86±9.762.53±10.6
 Median (Q1-Q3)62(54-70)63(56-69)62(54-70)
 
Sex (SEX)Female2974.41777.31270.6
 Male1025.6522.7529.4
 Total391002256.41743.6
 
RFYes2256.41254.51058.8
 No1743.61045.5741.2
 Total391002256.41743.6
 
ACPAYes2461.51463.61058.8
 No1538.5836.4741.2
 Total391002256.41743.6
 
RA duration (years) (RA_DURATION)Mean ±SD2.86±2.672.8±2.592.93±2.83
 Median (Q1-Q3)2(0.6-5)2(0.8-5)1(0.6-5)
 
DAS28 T0 (DAS28_T0)Mean ±SD5.55±1.035.43±1.195.7±0.8
 Median (Q1-Q3)5.83(4.68-6.27)5.48(4.5-6.27)5.98(4.9-6.14)
 
SDAI T0 (SDAI_T0)Mean ±SD35.37±22.6634.98±25.1835.86±19.68
 Median (Q1-Q3)28.1(21.3-43.1)25.45(21-43.1)30(25-39.3)
 
VAS PAIN T0 (VAS_PAIN_T0)Mean ±SD67.77±26.4766.86±29.4668.94±22.86
 Median (Q1-Q3)77(50-87)75(50-88)77(70-80)
 
CCSs (CCSS)Yes2256.4940.91376.5
 No1743.61359.1423.5
 Total391002256.41743.6
 
T2D duration (years) (T2D_DURATION)Mean ±SD1.64±1.891.02±0.942.44±2.47
 Median (Q1-Q3)1(0.6-2)0.75(0.6-1)2(0.8-3)
 
C Peptide mg/dL
(C_PEPTIDE)
Mean ±SD2.66±1.342.92±1.422.32±1.19
 Median (Q1-Q3)2.3(1.9-3.2)2.5(2-3.7)2.1(1.9-2.5)
 
A1c T0 (A1C_T0)Mean ±SD7.77±0.77.73±0.677.83±0.76
 Median (Q1-Q3)7.5(7.2-8.2)7.5(7.2-8.2)7.5(7.3-8.2)
 
FPG mg/dL T0 (FPG_T0)Mean ±SD139.13±42.17139.05±50.09139.25±29.55
 Median (Q1-Q3)132(113-154)131(101-158)132(116-150.5)
 
Albuminuria mg/L T0 (ALBUMINURIA_T0)Mean ±SD9.33±10.8811.93±12.145.98±8.15
 Median (Q1-Q3)5.64(0-15)9.6(0-20.7)0.21(0-10)
 
BMI T0 (BMI_T0)Mean ±SD27.93±4.0427.59±4.4828.38±3.47
 Median (Q1-Q3)27.7(25-30.86)27.65(24.7-30.86)28.7(25.97-29.9)
 
Insulin therapy (INSULIN_THERAPY)Yes1025.6418.2635.3
 No2974.41881.81164.7
 Total391002256.41743.6
 
Comorbidities (COMORBIDITIES)Yes391002210017100
 Total391002256.41743.6
 
Table 2 : Results – Baseline Characteristics of the Study Patients – Cross sort

# FPG mg/dL T0 (FPG_T0) : 1 unavailable data, 1 individual whose the “Study Drug (STUDY_DRUG)” item is filled “TNFi”

2.2. Measures of glycaemic control and bodyweight
[Top of page]
A significant reduction of A1c is observed in anakinra-treated participants when compared with TNFi-treated participants after 3 and 6 months of treatment (p = 0.0038 & p = 0.0004). The result is similar for FPG (p = 0.0362 & p = 0.0012).

 PopulationStudy Drug (STUDY_DRUG) 
 _AnakinraTNFi 
 N=39N=22N=17Statistic
Variable Mean±SD
Med(Q1Q3)
Mean±SD
Med(Q1Q3)
Mean±SD
Med(Q1Q3)
p
A1c T3 (A1C_T3)Mean ±SD7.27±0.726.95±0.617.64±0.68Sd p = 0.0038
 Median (Q1-Q3)7.2(6.8-7.8)6.8(6.7-7.5)7.35(7.2-8) 
 
A1c T6 (A1C_T6)Mean ±SD7.14±0.816.71±0.677.64±0.66Sd p = 0.0004
 Median (Q1-Q3)7.2(6.45-7.8)6.5(6.3-7.2)7.5(7.2-8.1) 
 
FPG mg/dL T3 (FPG_T3)Mean ±SD121.29±30.86111.37±30.52133.06±27.72Sd p = 0.0362
 Median (Q1-Q3)115(100-140)100(92-138)122.5(114-148.5) 
 
FPG mg/dL T6 (FPG_T6)Mean ±SD118.97±34.8699.59±11.88140.93±39.45Sd p = 0.0012
 Median (Q1-Q3)103.5(100-135)101(92-102)135(108-156) 
 
Sd : Student
Table 3 : Results – Measures of glycaemic control and bodyweight – Cross sort

# A1c T3 (A1C_T3) : 5 unavailable data, 4 individuals whose the “Study Drug (STUDY_DRUG)” item is filled “Anakinra” and 1 individual whose the “Study Drug (STUDY_DRUG)” item is filled “TNFi”
# A1c T6 (A1C_T6) : 7 unavailable data, 5 individuals whose the “Study Drug (STUDY_DRUG)” item is filled “Anakinra” and 2 individuals whose the “Study Drug (STUDY_DRUG)” item is filled “TNFi”
# FPG mg/dL T3 (FPG_T3) : 4 unavailable data, 3 individuals whose the “Study Drug (STUDY_DRUG)” item is filled “Anakinra” and 1 individual whose the “Study Drug (STUDY_DRUG)” item is filled “TNFi”
# FPG mg/dL T6 (FPG_T6) : 7 unavailable data, 5 individuals whose the “Study Drug (STUDY_DRUG)” item is filled “Anakinra” and 2 individuals whose the “Study Drug (STUDY_DRUG)” item is filled “TNFi”

2.3. Analysis of A1c as clinical response with unajusted linear mixed models
[Top of page]
A significant effect of treatment is observed on A1c according to visit in the nonadjusted linear mixed model (p = 0.0048).

 A1C 
 N=105 
Variable MD*[95%CI]p
Visit according to Study Drug (STUDY_DRUG2_VISIT2)Anakinra, T00Wd p = 0.0048
n=105
 Anakinra, T3-0.782[-1.093 ; -0.471] 
 Anakinra, T6-1.026[-1.384 ; -0.668] 
 TNFi, T0 0.098[-0.345 ; 0.540] 
 TNFi, T3-0.094[-0.516 ; 0.328] 
 TNFi, T6-0.092[-0.513 ; 0.330] 
 
Sex (SEX)Female0Wd p = 0.8792
n=105
 Male-0.037[-0.509 ; 0.435] 
 
Age (AGE) -0.002[-0.020 ; 0.017]Wd p = 0.8664
n=105
 
RA duration (years) (RA_DURATION)  0.063[-0.024 ; 0.149]Wd p = 0.1565
n=105
 
CCSs (CCSS)Yes0Wd p = 0.5595
n=105
 No-0.124[-0.538 ; 0.289] 
 
T2D duration (years) (T2D_DURATION)  0.042[-0.026 ; 0.109]Wd p = 0.1575
n=105
 
Oral antidiabetic drugs (ORAL_ANTIDIA_DRUGS)Yes0Wd p = 0.0932
n=105
 No 0.444[-0.043 ; 0.931] 
 
ACPAYes0Wd p = 0.9068
n=105
 No-0.025[-0.440 ; 0.390] 
 
BMI  0.022[-0.026 ; 0.069]Wd p = 0.3767
n=105
 
Wd : Wald   *MD : Mean Difference
Table 4 : Results – Analysis of A1c as clinical response with unajusted linear mixed models – Association strengths in univariate analyzes

2.4. Analysis of A1c as clinical response with multivariate linear mixed model
[Top of page]
An association is observed between treatment and A1c in the multivariate linear mixed model after 3 months (MD 0.848, 95% CI 0.179 to 1.516) and 6 months (MD 1.085, 95% CI 0.472 to 1.699).

 A1C 
 N=105n=105
Variable MD*[95%CI]Wd p
Study Drug (STUDY_DRUG)Anakinra0 0.0608
 TNFi 0.242[-0.416 ; 0.901] 
 
Visit (VISIT)T00< 0.0001
 T3-0.792[-1.064 ; -0.520] 
 T6-1.010[-1.333 ; -0.688] 
 
Sex (SEX)Female0 0.5275
 Male-0.189[-0.756 ; 0.379] 
 
Age (AGE) -0.008[-0.028 ; 0.013] 0.4829
 
RA duration (years) (RA_DURATION)  0.078[-0.003 ; 0.159] 0.0746
 
CCSs (CCSS)Yes0 0.3284
 No 0.289[-0.259 ; 0.837] 
 
T2D duration (years) (T2D_DURATION) -0.064[-0.205 ; 0.077] 0.3832
 
Oral antidiabetic drugs (ORAL_ANTIDIA_DRUGS)Yes0 0.2225
 No 0.346[-0.190 ; 0.882] 
 
ACPAYes0 0.7949
 No 0.055[-0.362 ; 0.471] 
 
BMI -0.017[-0.073 ; 0.040] 0.5794
 
Wd : Wald   *MD : Mean Difference
Table 5 : Results – Analysis of A1c as clinical response with multivariate linear mixed model – Association strengths in multivariate analysis

« Study Drug (STUDY_DRUG) vs Visit (VISIT) » interaction : p=0.0015

DescriptionMD*[IC95%]
STUDY_DRUG TNFi vs Anakinra in VISIT T30.848[ 0.179 ; 1.516]
STUDY_DRUG TNFi vs Anakinra in VISIT T61.085[ 0.472 ; 1.699]
STUDY_DRUG TNFi vs Anakinra in VISIT T00.242[-0.416 ; 0.901]
Table 6 : Results – Analysis of A1c as clinical response with multivariate linear mixed model – Description of association strengths in multivariate analysis

2.5. Analysis of FPG as clinical response with unajusted linear mixed models
[Top of page]
A significant effect of treatment is observed on FPG according to visit in the nonadjusted linear mixed model (p = 0.0025).

 FPG 
 N=105 
Variable MD*[95%CI]p
Visit according to Study Drug (STUDY_DRUG2_VISIT2)Anakinra, T00Wd p = 0.0025
n=105
 Anakinra, T3-27.68[-48.74 ; -6.618] 
 Anakinra, T6-39.46[-61.07 ; -17.84] 
 TNFi, T0 0.205[-24.59 ; 24.998] 
 TNFi, T3-5.983[-30.30 ; 18.330] 
 TNFi, T6 1.888[-26.22 ; 29.999] 
 
Sex (SEX)Female0Wd p = 0.1778
n=105
 Male14.318[-5.295 ; 33.931] 
 
Age (AGE)  0.270[-0.324 ; 0.863]Wd p = 0.3765
n=105
 
RA duration (years) (RA_DURATION)  1.847[-1.250 ; 4.944]Wd p = 0.2250
n=105
 
CCSs (CCSS)Yes0Wd p = 0.7913
n=105
 No-2.139[-17.93 ; 13.649] 
 
T2D duration (years) (T2D_DURATION)  0.017[-2.585 ; 2.618]Wd p = 0.9900
n=105
 
Oral antidiabetic drugs (ORAL_ANTIDIA_DRUGS)Yes0Wd p = 0.3155
n=105
 No 8.946[-8.060 ; 25.952] 
 
ACPAYes0Wd p = 0.7103
n=105
 No-3.040[-19.03 ; 12.953] 
 
BMI  0.052[-2.319 ; 2.423]Wd p = 0.9658
n=105
 
Wd : Wald   *MD : Mean Difference
Table 7 : Results – Analysis of FPG as clinical response with unajusted linear mixed models – Association strengths in univariate analyzes

2.6. Analysis of DAS28 as clinical response with unajusted linear mixed models
[Top of page]
A significant effect of treatment is observed on DAS28 according to visit in the nonadjusted linear mixed model (p < 0.0001).

 DAS28 
 N=106 
Variable MD*[95%CI]p
Visit according to Study Drug (STUDY_DRUG2_VISIT2)Anakinra, T00Wd p < 0.0001
n=106
 Anakinra, T3-2.474[-3.039 ; -1.908] 
 Anakinra, T6-2.648[-3.306 ; -1.989] 
 TNFi, T0 0.272[-0.337 ; 0.880] 
 TNFi, T3-1.487[-2.168 ; -0.806] 
 TNFi, T6-1.844[-2.703 ; -0.984] 
 
Sex (SEX)Female0Wd p = 0.2229
n=106
 Male-0.499[-1.235 ; 0.237] 
 
Age (AGE)  0.016[-0.017 ; 0.048]Wd p = 0.3603
n=106
 
RA duration (years) (RA_DURATION) -0.036[-0.176 ; 0.103]Wd p = 0.6094
n=106
 
CCSs (CCSS)Yes0Wd p = 0.8896
n=106
 No 0.048[-0.628 ; 0.723] 
 
T2D duration (years) (T2D_DURATION)  0.000[-0.190 ; 0.191]Wd p = 0.9959
n=106
 
Oral antidiabetic drugs (ORAL_ANTIDIA_DRUGS)Yes0Wd p = 0.0310
n=106
 No 0.821[ 0.165 ; 1.476] 
 
ACPAYes0Wd p = 0.1702
n=106
 No-0.503[-1.193 ; 0.188] 
 
BMI  0.077[ 0.004 ; 0.149]Wd p = 0.0903
n=106
 
Wd : Wald   *MD : Mean Difference
Table 8 : Results – Analysis of DAS28 as clinical response with unajusted linear mixed models – Association strengths in univariate analyzes

Tables and figures
 
Table 1 : Encodings
Table 2 : Results – Baseline Characteristics of the Study Patients – Cross sort
Table 3 : Results – Measures of glycaemic control and bodyweight – Cross sort
Table 4 : Results – Analysis of A1c as clinical response with unajusted linear mixed models – Association strengths in univariate analyzes
Table 5 : Results – Analysis of A1c as clinical response with multivariate linear mixed model – Association strengths in multivariate analysis
Table 6 : Results – Analysis of A1c as clinical response with multivariate linear mixed model – Description of association strengths in multivariate analysis
Table 7 : Results – Analysis of FPG as clinical response with unajusted linear mixed models – Association strengths in univariate analyzes
Table 8 : Results – Analysis of DAS28 as clinical response with unajusted linear mixed models – Association strengths in univariate analyzes
Figure 1 : Study profile – Flowchart – Flowchart
Date of completion : 9 June 2021
Implementer : RUS
Software version 0.1
- Share the content -

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *